Stay compliant and optimize spend with the IBM license metric tool – ILMT
Koen Dingjan, IBM specialist at ITAA
Stay compliant and optimize spend with the IBM license metric tool – ILMT.
Koen Dingjan, IBM specialist at ITAA
If your organization uses IBM, you may be familiar with the sub capacity requirements for processor-based licenses such as PVU and RVU MAPC. Failure to meet the sub capacity terms and conditions is the single most significant compliance risk area for IBM customers, as it requires you to pay licenses for the physical host capacity instead of the capacity allocated to virtual machines. This can increase the required number of PVU or RVU MAPC licenses ten-fold.
While customers are increasingly complying with the sub capacity reporting requirement by installing ILMT, IBM and its auditors are becoming increasingly stringent in their requirements of how ILMT should be configured and maintained. IBM often uses any discrepancy to claim that the full capacity license requirements apply – essentially the same scenario as if ILMT had not been installed at all.
During software license reviews, IBM’s auditors are trained to quickly check certain metrics in ILMT such as:
Some of these items can be resolved easily, others require more work. Maintaining ILMT in good shape should therefore be a continuous activity and the ILMT dashboard is a good tool to monitor the health status of these metrics. Any ILMT Audit Snapshot report also contains useful details in the data condition audit file.
As well as avoiding the full capacity licensing risk, it is important to consider factors that can inflate PVU values. These issues won’t necessarily cause IBM to claim full capacity, but they can cause unnecessary spend by incorrectly inflating reported PVU values.
Three areas in particular may cause inflated numbers in ILMT.
When first installed and deployed, initial ILMT reports are usually far from accurate. Carefully reviewing your IBM entitlements and the technical environment is critical for accurate software classification in ILMT. The administrator of ILMT in your organization cannot shoulder this responsibility alone, as correct ILMT reporting requires input from many parts of the business, including contract holders, technical administrators and business owners of the IBM licenses.
When ILMT is successfully installed and configured, you can reduce your compliance risk and gain useful insights into cost-saving opportunities. After the initial implementation and configuration, keeping ILMT up to date and accurate can be a simple activity if the right processes are in place to apply updates, generate reports, and resolve discrepancies.
If your organization is struggling to get ILMT to work properly, or you need help with a fresh installation, our ILMT implementation guide can help. Please contact me at kdingjan@itassetalliance.com to receive a copy.
We’d love to meet. For an interview, a request for a proposal or just a question: Please fill out the form and we’ll be in touch within 24 hours.